On CHOW: Turkey recipes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

December 7th, 2006

Pretexting bill to be fast-tracked through Senate

Posted by Richard Koman @ December 7, 2006 @ 12:47 PM

Categories: Congress, Government technology, Law enforcement, State & Local Govt

Tags: Phone, Pretexting, U.S. Senate, ZDNet Government

There are a lot of things Senate won't get to before the end of the 109th Congress, but if Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has his way, the Senate will get to pass a bill making pretexting definitively illegal, News.com reports.

Pretexting of course was the scheme used by HP investigators to get at phone records of board members and reporters as they looked into internal leaks. But it is also regularly used by law enforecment. Frist will use a procedural technique known as "hotlining," in which a bill already passed by the House would clear the Senate without debate and land on the president's desk. It could be approved as soon as Thursday.

The legislation says anyone who purchases, sells or tries to obtain confidential phone records could face up to a decade behind bars. Police and intelligence agencies, however, would be exempt. They would be permitted to continue to engage in pretexting themselves or to hire private investigators to do it for them–a common government practice.

Federal and local law enforcement officials are frequent customers of Internet-based pretexting services. Some companies, like Advanced Research, have admitted in letters to Congress that they did work for the FBI. But Republicans bottled up antipretexting legislation backed by Democrats that might have regulated government use of fraudulent means to access telephone records.

The bill stalled in the Senate earlier because some versions of the bill wanted telephone companies to take more responsibility for protecting customers' records, which was fought by cellphone companies.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 3 Talkback(s)
Nuances of use for information gained through pretexting
I am not a lawyer, but I agree that no one should be convicted of anything using data acquired under pretexting. I ask several questions: should information gained by pretexting be usable to establis... (Read the rest)
Posted by: genghiskhat Posted on: 12/11/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
So in other words...  el1jones | 12/07/06
I agree, mostly  tgeliot | 12/11/06
Nuances of use for information gained through pretexting  genghiskhat | 12/11/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

advertisement
Click Here

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here