On BNET: Online porn struggles for profits
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

May 18th, 2009

Scalia gets a schooling in online privacy

Posted by Richard Koman @ May 18, 2009 @ 8:41 AM

Categories: Government technology

Tags:

Justice Antonin Scalia doesn’t think there’s much need for Internet privacy rules. Speaking at the Institute of American and Talmudic Law, he exclaimed:

“Every single datum about my life is private? That’s silly.”

At Fordham University Law School, Prof. Joel Reidenberg took up the gauntlet and assigned his students to complile a “dossier” on the life of Justice Scalia. Above the Law reported that Reidenberg discussed the project at a Fordham conference on privacy.

“Justice Scalia said he doesn’t care what people find out about him on the Internet,” said Reidenberg during his presentation on the transparency of personal information. “So I challenged my class to compile a dossier on him.”


The results, according to the Times:

The class managed to create a dossier of 15 pages, Professor Reidenberg reported to a conference on privacy at Fordham, that included the justice’s home address and home phone number, his wife’s personal e-mail address and the TV shows and food he prefers.

Scalia didn’t care much for the stunt but, of course, he said it didn’t change his mind about privacy.

I stand by my remark at the Institute of American and Talmudic Law conference that it is silly to think that every single datum about my life is private. I was referring, of course, to whether every single datum about my life deserves privacy protection in law.

It is not a rare phenomenon that what is legal may also be quite irresponsible. That appears in the First Amendment context all the time. What can be said often should not be said. Prof. Reidenberg’s exercise is an example of perfectly legal, abominably poor judgment. Since he was not teaching a course in judgment, I presume he felt no responsibility to display any.

But of course he was far more responsible than not only the identity-theft criminals but also the Internet companies that would trace your footsteps across the Web.

As law student Chris Reid pointed out in the Times article: “People are willing to give up a lot of privacy for a small benefit. They don’t know the full cost.”

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 19 Talkback(s)
Just better enforcement

Once information about you gets out, there is no way to get it back. If it is financial, legal or medical when you expected privacy, the problem becomes even worse. It could haunt you for years... (Read the rest)
Posted by: madmike13 Posted on: 05/20/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
I agree with Scalia  clarnT | 05/18/09
Internet Security would be a Breeze if it weren't for Anonymity  jpgeorgia | 05/18/09
re: I agree with Scalia  none none | 05/18/09
RE: Scalia gets a schooling in online privacy  Hameiri | 05/18/09
Let me take a wild guess  frgough | 05/18/09
Nice spin...  techboy_z | 05/18/09
It's motivated out of the fact that it was reported in the NYT  rkoman@... | 05/18/09
RE: Scalia gets a schooling in online privacy  schaefferb | 05/18/09
RE: Scalia gets a schooling in online privacy  MadWhiteHatter | 05/18/09
RE: Scalia gets a schooling in online privacy  gene.kraft@... | 05/18/09
just shows Scalia's technological ignorance.  melissa1125 | 05/18/09
RE: Scalia gets a schooling in online privacy  djlucid | 05/18/09
Only 15 pages?  Winston1874 | 05/18/09
Just imagine Google's databases  jorjitop | 05/18/09
re: There aught to be a law against anyone accumulating...  MadWhiteHatter | 05/19/09
So don't publish on Google  epcraig | 05/19/09
Why another law?  arminw | 05/20/09
Just better enforcement  madmike13 | 05/20/09
Scalia has his mind made up.  pikeman666 | 05/20/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads