On MovieTome: The next Spider-Man villain?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

November 9th, 2007

Under PIRATE bill, Justice Dept would sue filesharers

Posted by Richard Koman @ November 9, 2007 @ 9:58 PM

Categories: Congress, Justice

Tags: Patrick Leahy, Attorney General, Piracy, Peer To Peer (P2P), Government, Intellectual Property, Business Operations, Corporate Law, Internet, Research & Development

Those representatives of the people, your U.S. senators, may not be able to block the nomination of an attorney general who is not sure that waterboarding is torture, but they are ready to fight against a true evil: P2P pirates.

Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and John Cornyn (R-TX) have introduced, for the third time, the PIRATE Act (PDF), which somehow is shorthand for the Intellectual Property Enforcement Act, Ars Technica reports.

The bill would authorize the Department of Justice to bring civil charges against file-sharing scum, limiting the penalties to those that could be imposed in criminal charges (excepting jailtime, of course.) The Attorney General could pursue civil charges only if the act would also constitute a crime.

So, why does the recording industry need the government to do its litigation dirty work? Maybe so those trying to make a buck off of consumers don’t have to come across as the same people trying to bankrupt consumers like Jammie Thomas? Or maybe Leahy has it right:

“Copyright infringement silently drains America’s economy and undermines the talent, creativity and initiative that are a great source of strength to our nation. When we protect intellectual property from copyright infringement, we protect our economy and our ideas.”

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 18 Talkback(s)
No money, no infringement
I don't think it's true that if no money is made there's no infrigement. As you point out, copyright is the right to exclude others from using your work without your permission. So if you were an auth... (Read the rest)
Posted by: rkoman@... Posted on: 11/14/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Bi-partisan scum?  wmlundine | 11/12/07
Amen!  newsletters@... | 11/12/07
Need to vote these out of office  kokuryu | 11/12/07
RE: Under PIRATE bill, Justice Dept would sue filesharers  vorris@... | 11/12/07
RE: Under PIRATE bill, Justice Dept would sue filesharers  wgrimes | 11/12/07
Actually, no  rkoman@... | 11/12/07
Have we so quickly forgotten. Remember Sattellite TV ?  1stcyberian | 11/12/07
Agreed 100%  Raymond Danner | 11/12/07
Absolutely Gardamn Right!  thx-1138_@... | 11/14/07
RE: Under PIRATE bill, Justice Dept would sue filesharers  EKRULL8@... | 11/12/07
one nuance, though  rkoman@... | 11/12/07
money talks  madmike13 | 11/12/07
Again buy a rep but they don't come cheap  wizardb@... | 11/12/07
RE: Under PIRATE bill, Justice Dept would sue filesharers  gracioustinker | 11/12/07
Hard to argue...  John L. Ries | 11/13/07
read a similar article on cnet  jeremy.young1@... | 11/13/07
RE: Under PIRATE bill, Justice Dept would sue filesharers  StriderAAW | 11/14/07
No money, no infringement  rkoman@... | 11/14/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here